Discord has confirmed a major security breach that exposed the government-issued IDs and IP addresses of at least 70,000 users. The Discord Breach happened when hackers targeted a third-party company that Discord uses to handle its age verification appeals process, highlighting the growing privacy risks of proving you’re old enough to be online.
What Exactly Happened?
On October 9, 2025, Discord announced that hackers had infiltrated one of its vendors. This vendor was responsible for checking IDs when users appealed an underage account suspension. The hackers made off with a trove of sensitive personal data that could be used for identity theft, blackmail, or other cyberattacks.
While Discord confirmed at least 70,000 users were impacted, some reports suggest the breach could be much larger. Hackers allegedly stole around 1.5 terabytes of data, a massive amount that could contain far more records than initially reported, though Discord has disputed the exact size of the theft.
The Age Verification Dilemma: Security vs Safety
This incident exposes a major challenge for online platforms: how to keep users safe without compromising their privacy.
What’s Next for Digital ID Checks after Discord Breach?
Experts warn this breach should be a wake-up call. The push for mandatory age verification is growing worldwide, but this event shows that the methods currently used are vulnerable. The industry is now under pressure to find better, more secure ways to verify age without forcing users to hand over their most sensitive documents.
Privacy advocates have long warned about these dangers. Rachel Sanders from the Electronic Frontier Foundation stated, “Breaches like this are a stark reminder that we need better privacy protections and more privacy-preserving verification methods“.
Future solutions might include new technologies that can prove your age without actually showing your ID, but these are still in early development. For now, the incident serves as a serious lesson: protecting user data is just as important as complying with regulations.
Editor’s Recommendation
